First, although at the latest holtsprake, held on May 1st, 1631 at Vessem, the intolerable fact performed by those of Heino in our mark in the year 1630 has been presented to the Lords inheritors in a serious manner, as well as to the Lord Drost by petition. And, although the Lord Drost at first had devised a standstill between those of Raalte and those of Heino, both parties refraining from digging and mowing for a year, this agreement having been observed by parties such as it was [talis qualis]. And [although] it had been agreed at the latest holtspraeke this standstill should be continued, those of Heino have abolished the agreement and are intruding our lands like they used to do before, mowing and digging at will, ruining our fields, and although it had been decided at the same holsprake regarding this, one would be legally allowed to act upon this offences, the expenses of these actions to be distributed among the shares, the chairmen of the assembly of the mark nevertheless request a sentence by the Lords inheritors about this. It has been decided that on behalf of Raelte, besides the chairmen of the assembly of the mark, the noble Herman van der Becke, Henrick Knopert, Johan ten Marsch and the clerk will be nominated to appear at that place [in court].