The chairman of the assembly of the mark and the commissioned members, having examined the proposal handed over to them by some inheritors in accordance with the resolution of the inheritors of April 22nd, 1825, proposing the dividing of the lands of the marke, based on the decision of the former king of Holland [Lodewijk Napoleon] of April 16th, 1809, nr. 7 and followed by the Decision of that same day nr. 7, issued on the 10th of May, 1810, are honoured to report: [that] to them the written proposal concerned and the plan mentioned in that proposal, seems to be completely unworkable and to be in contradiction with the Royal Decision mentioned, since these [Decisions] do contain prescriptions regarding the division of barren lands in order to stimulate the cultivation and fertilizing of these lands, however never intending to deprive the inhabitants of the marke who have limited means of these common meadows, being indispensable to them, by digging up and splitting up these common meadows, since it will not be possible to compensate those of little means for their right of pasture by allotting them  minor share in the marshlands to be divided, because, according to the measuring, the total amount of the marshlands within the marke, including marshlands of both good and bad quality, is about 600 hectares. 439 households are entitled to these marshlands, including both those who own shares and those who don't. Assuming that there are 60 full shares within the marke, those shares, according to the plan concerned, being allotted four times as much land as those not owning shares, therefore amounting to 180 portions, the total amount including the aforementioned 439 adding up to 619 portions, meaning, according to the aforementioned measuring, the surface per portion would be less than 1 hectare. Assuming the common and special roads, the ditches and the drainage systems will take up at least a quarter of this surface, a surface of only just over a hectare remains, this surface never to be regarded as being a fair and reasonable compensation for the free use of heath and free pasture. Based on the arguments mentioned above the chairman of the assembly of the marke and the commissioned members of the assembly have proposed to refer the plaintiffs to the proper authorities that have been designated by the aforementioned Decisions, keeping in mind the intentions prescribed by those Decisions.