[…] It its ordered that each individual shall irrigate according to his rights and he shall continue doing that, and if it was the case that, while the individual who enjoyed the right in second, middle or last position was watering, [the individual who enjoyed the right to irrigate in first position?] wanted to water for a second time, he is not allowed to do it until the irrigation of all the fields, estate or estates that they wanted to irrigate had finished; so, after that, the individual enjoying the right in first position shall water again and in this way the irrigation shall continue; and, if it was the case that any neighbour or neighbours of this village were watering in an estate or estates where they did not enjoy the right to irrigate and, at that same time, a person who enjoyed the right wanted to irrigate , it is established [´es visto´] that [… confusing writing…], in this situation, the irrigation of the estate or estates has to finish and the individual whose right [turn] was has to enjoy his right; and the person who contravened this article shall get as a penalty each time 4 reales assigned according to the indicated way and, in order to demonstrate, it shall suffice the proof above indicated.