[Clarification of the article 23 on the prohibition to extract wood, straw and manure as well as to lend name and cooperation to a foreign person to extract wood]
First. The prohibition to the neighbours not co-users of extracting wood, straw and manure. Second: That shall be considered infractors related to wood the neighbours of the community who lend their name and cooperation so other neighbours outside it [the community] can do that [to extract wood]. Third:  What is said regarding wood has to be understood also for the other uses […] so it is not allowed to lend name and cooperation […] to extract manure, straw or lime, sow, or enjoy any other rights. Fourth: It is forbidden for the neighbours of the community the use of the Bardenas for the direct and inmediate benefit of others who are not [neighbors of the community] and, therefore, it is not allowed to carry manure, wood or straw to villages outside the [common] enjoyment, either with own or someone else's carts, with labourers or foreign neighbors, with the only limitation expressed in favor of the wood cutters […], the poor class, which is limited to the wood cutter […] and, because of this, it is required that he had to cut the wood by himself and carry it with his cattle […] Lastly, considering that in the exploitation there are two different rights, the [right to] extract and [the right] of the consumer, [the right] to cut the wood or load the manure and [the right of] to burn [the wood] and distribute in his estates the manure; allowing to extract these products outside the villages of the community in any way this was done, [the rights] of the co-users to the use are betrayed and the provision of these products to the villages is endangered […]