It Is indispensable that the village councils, chiefly those which are adjoining to the Bardenas, appoint a number enough of  guides ['monteros'] among the people with a good behaviour, morality and knowledge […] [As a consequence of the problems created by the existence of difference in the salaries of the monteros among villages], the majors […] shall avoid these inconveniences, indicating fair and proportional salaries […], establishing their duty of attendance to the city hall the 29th of September, after the cattle had accessed the Bardenas, [so] their obligations could be read, the one who did not want to continue shall be removed, titles for the new ones shall be awarded and they shall take an oath […]
It is also convenient that in the letter of the guide, awarded by the secretaries, the salary of the 'montero' is indicated. [The monteros who did not observe] the right and obligations of guiding the cattle or who did it contravening the established rules, who demanded a higher salary or did not denounce the transgression they observed in the exploitation of the Bardenas shall be removed and punished by the majors.
The guards should not guide the cattle; in case of not being 'monteros' available in the village, the local authority must appoint a guide, if its possible taking an oath and indicating that faculty in the letter of the guide.
The right and obligation of guiding the cattle pertains to the 'monteros'. This service must be performed in turns […], guiding always through the shortest distance, […] and strictly observing the articles of the regulations which indicate the time the cattle can stay in the Bardenas.