The discussion about costs and benefits of preregistration has been
hindered by a lack of a conceptual analysis of what preregistration aims
to accomplish. Any conceptual definition about a tool that scientists
use must examine the goal it has. Scientists differ in the goals they
have, which depend in turn on their philosophy of science. It is
therefore important to justify the value of preregistration based on a
philosophy of science. This presentation distinguishes the goal of
preregistration from positive externalities and highlights the
importance of evaluating the usefulness of a tool such as
preregistration from one specific philosophy of science.